vision2020
P&Z Commission, City of Moscow
- To: vision2020@moscow.com
- Subject: P&Z Commission, City of Moscow
- From: "Mike Curley" <curley@CYPHER.TURBONET.COM>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 09:08:54 +0000
- Comments: Authenticated sender is <curley@mail.turbonet.com>
- Priority: normal
- Resent-Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 09:11:01 -0700 (PDT)
- Resent-From: vision2020@moscow.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <"OuAXMD.A.IPF.5hlc3"@whale.fsr.net>
- Resent-Sender: vision2020-request@moscow.com
For those interested, here is an unofficial summary of the 6/23/99 meeting of
the Moscow Planning and Zoning Commission. A request was heard for a special
use permit to establish a temporary (18-24 months) helipad on the south 75' of
Blaine Street for emergency medical services. After a public hearing and
discussion among Commission members, the Commission approved the helipad for a
period of 9 months--until 3/31/00--on condition that the preferred approach and
departure sector be from 080 to 210 degrees, that concrete barriers be
installed, and that signage and reflective painting be included on the site.
An alternative site was necessitated because the U of I is withdrawing the
helicopter landing site it has provided at the University because the site is
being developed for new buildings. Services are being terminated as of July 1,
1999. Some Commission members felt that the Blaine St. site was less than
ideal, and were concerned that installation of a permanent site was proposed by
the applicants to come from Gritman Medical Center because there was no
existing commitment from Gritman (written or otherwise) to provide such a site
at any specific date in the future. The Commission granted a special use
permit for a substantially shorter period than the applicant requested, some
members suggesting that they would expect a more appropriate site for a
permanent pad to be suggested before expiration of the special use permit.
The sign ordinance subcommittee submitted proposed revisions to the draft
ordinance and discussed the reasons for the amendments. Written suggestions
were received by the Commission from a group of local business owners. There
was a consensus that a few additional revisions should be made (that did not
change the substance of the ordinance), that some unclear points in the
business owners' materials be investigated further, and that the newly revised
draft be submitted to the Commission for consideration at its July 14 meeting
with an expectation of setting a public hearing thereafter. [In the interim,
public comments and questions continue to be welcomed by the Commission or the
subcommittee members].
Mike Curley
curley@turbonet.com
208-882-3536
Back to TOC