vision2020
Re: Gun Legislation
- To: Erikus4@aol.com, vision2020@moscow.com
- Subject: Re: Gun Legislation
- From: "T&E" <cumming@idaho.tds.net>
- Date: Thu, 29 Apr 1999 23:13:34 +0000
- Resent-Date: Thu, 29 Apr 1999 23:01:32 -0700 (PDT)
- Resent-From: vision2020@moscow.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <"F3JI2.A.WM.jcUK3"@whale.fsr.net>
- Resent-Sender: vision2020-request@moscow.com
Well said.
>>Is it completely crazy to push for gun
>>control in Idaho? Is it incompletely crazy?
>
>"Gun Control" - Yes.
>
>Disclaimer - I'm very pro-gun. And very pro-responsibility. (Isn't it
crazy
>anyone must assert that they are "pro-responsibility". Oh well, welcome to
>the USA.)
>
>That said, "gun control" is a phrase with tremendous emotional
implications.
>(Just like "assault rifle.") The pro-gun side sees it as "gun
prohibition."
>The anti-gun side asserts that it means only reasonable restrictions -
>denying that elimination of guns is an ultimate goal (and for many - most?
-
>elimination IS the goal). I think any legislation presented as "gun
control"
>is doomed to failure in Idaho.
>
>>I am not familiar w/ the current laws on gun ownership in Idaho.
>
>Then WHY do you presume we need MORE law? Please research the current
laws.
>And please remember law, by itself, does very little to prevent people from
>doing what they want to do.
>
>I'm not saying more law isn't any kind of possible answer, but that we
should
>examine what we are trying to actually prevent and how we go about it.
>Millions of minors possess and use firearms in a completely lawful manner.
>Possession of firearms doesn't cause violence. The problem is that some
>minors (and majors) decide that violence is the Right thing to do.
>
>If you are sincere about proposing new legislation, please carefully
consider
>the actual need and the actual effects. We've got too many laws that do
>neither. "Gun control" legislation usually lives on emotion and not
reason.
>(Example: "assault rifle" ban will seriously reduce crime - when in
reality
>the vast majority of crime is committed with firearms other than "assault
>rifles".)
>
>And please remember that in a free society, some people WILL choose to
abuse
>their freedom - no matter what. I can't quote the source, but Freedom is
the
>one thing you cannot have without giving it to all others.
>
>(And along those lines, everyone heard about the abuse heaped upon SUVs
>because they are such large, menacing machines and cause more people to be
>injured and killed in accidents. Today, firearms. Tomorrow, SUVs. Next
>week, everything sharper than a butter knife.)
>
>E. O'Daniel
>IDAHO
>
Back to TOC