vision2020@moscow.com: Re: Vision 20/20 Member Attacked and Seriously Injured

Re: Vision 20/20 Member Attacked and Seriously Injured

Bill London (london@wsunix.wsu.edu)
Fri, 16 May 1997 08:39:11 -0700 (PDT)

Fritz and Matt--
Of course, this thing sucks, but I thought you might enjoy reading
a short piece that appeared in the Lewiston Morning Tribune today (Friday
may 16), page 6C.
Entitled "Moscow officer is under investigation" the first
paragraph reads:
"A Moscow police officer's conduct will be investigated after he
was reportedly hesitant in investigating an incident." The following
graphs report you both by name and say that Captain Don Lanpher is heading
the investigation.
BL

On Thu, 15 May 1997, Fritz Knorr wrote:

> Matt Kitterman, vision 20/20 member (see his post
> from yesterday), was attacked and seriously injured
> yesterday evening in front of his house on Deakin
> St. Extension. The attack followed a high speed
> vehicular assault in the crosswalk at the
> intersection of Deakin and Taylor Streets.
>
> Matt and I played tennis yesterday at the U of I
> courts. We finished up around 6:30 PM, and the
> attack happened while we were walking home. We're
> neighbors, so after tennis, we usually head for
> his house, I pet Dixie the dog a little and head
> on home to supper. Well, it was hot yesterday, so
> after playing, Matt was drinking water from a
> water bottle as we walked.
>
> As we approached the crosswalk on Taylor St.,
> there was a string of traffic, so we waited for a
> break in the traffic and proceeded across Taylor.
> When we were two steps past the curb, we signaled
> with the "stop" hand signal to an approaching
> westbound car. The car then *accelerated* and cut
> in front of us, only inches away. In the course
> of jumping back, some water splashed from Matt's
> water bottle onto the car.
>
> We continued across Taylor and up Deakin St.
> Deakin St. extension isn't really a street in that
> section, it is more of a one-lane gravel alley in
> that section, so we were walking down an alley to
> Matt's home. As we were walking, we heard a car
> approaching behind us really fast. We turned
> around to judge how to jump out of the way, and it
> was that same car. The car ground to a halt and
> the driver and passenger on the right jumped out
> and surrounded Matt. I looked closely to get the
> license number, 4AJ810, California, a gray 4-door
> late model sedan.
>
> The driver and passenger were young black men,
> with stocky builds and are probably U of I or WSU
> athletes. The two black men surrounded Matt,
> grabbed his racket from him and hit him, HARD, on
> the head with his racket. He started gushing
> blood. I moved in to interfere with the beating,
> and the passenger turned on me with Matt's racket.
> We stood there in a racket-to-racket stand off,
> while the driver proceeded to thump on Matt. Poor
> Matt was in a bloody fog by then, after being
> whacked on the head; so he was easily pushed to
> the ground and punched and hit. And I was pinned
> down in this racket fencing thing.
>
> After a few more kicks and punches to Matt the
> attackers retreated to their car and sped away. I
> ran back to Matt's house and dialed 911. I guess
> I did leave him in a bloody heap in the alley. Oh
> well, sorry Matt. I thought it was important to
> get the authorities. Little did I know.
>
> A patrol car did eventually respond to my 911
> call. The investigating officer, Leonard Sombret
> said that there probably was no prosecutable
> crime. Of course, prosecution involves the
> courts. A police officer can only speak from his
> experience from previous cases and from his
> criminal justice training The officer is not the
> prosecutor or the judge. But a police officer is
> very involved in criminal justice on a daily basis
> and can therefore "bottom line" the situation as
> to what he thinks the prosecutor and the courts
> would do. Given that, the investigating officer's
> take on the various aspects of this case was:
>
> 1. The crosswalk assault by a speeding car:
> Officer Sombret didn't see any problem at all. He
> repeated the general police advice for pedestrians
> run down in crosswalks. Get the license number
> and a description of the driver. Contact the
> police. Well, I DID that. But, he was clearly
> not going any further with it. If there was
> anything to sucessfully prosecte, I'm sure that
> Officer Sombret would pursue it.
>
> 2. The later vehicular assault in the Deakin St.
> alley: The driver was justified because some water
> splashed on his car when he startled the
> pedestrians in the crosswalk. This is not the
> officer speaking, of course, but it is his best
> guess of what the courts would say.
>
> 4. The violent beating: We didn't run away fast
> enough. We turned around to get out of the way of
> the speeding car in the one lane alley. Worse, we
> then hung around to get the vehicle license
> number. Therefore, it is a "mutual combat"
> situation. The license number turned out to be
> semi-useless.
>
> The investigation: This is a place where the
> police do call the shots. Matt and I were
> interviewed. We wrote out statements. The
> vehicle registration was looked up. It was
> registered to a *surprise* California address.
> Officer Sombret did say that he looked in the
> local phone books for someone of the name on the
> registration. No luck.
>
> And that's where it stands this morning. If you
> see that vehicle, do not approach the driver!!
> Inform the police, they might interview the
> attacker.
>
> Heidi took Matt to the emergency room. He got the
> gash on his head stitched up, but he still has a
> big ol' knot on his head, too. You might want to
> send Matt a get well message.
>
> Fritz
>
>
>
>


This archive courtesy of:
First Step Internet