If so, then your implication that the full 25% reduction has to come from
the non-required things which are done by the county is not quite true. it
may be that aportion of that can come from optimizations at the "required"
level as well. If we save 10% in the overall required services, then only
15% must come from the rest etc.
johnt
>>>>> "Steve" == Steve Cooke <scooke@marvin.csrv.uidaho.edu> writes:
> ....Therefore, the 25% reduction in county
> revenues (state wide average) would fall disproportionately on
> services not on this list ...