vision2020@moscow.com: Re: The Crime Revisited

Re: The Crime Revisited

Fritz Knorr (fritzk@moscow.com)
Thu, 14 Dec 1995 19:13:56 -0800

HOO BOY!

Am I a jerk or what?

Sorry to everyone for filling up you mail with such junk. That kind of
stuff belongs on talk radio.

Maybe it was like the Gilligan's Island episode where Gilligan got hit on
the head with a coconut, and one of his fillings began receiving radio
signals. Maybe I started getting talk radio in one of my fillings. I
dunno....I was eating fruitcake the night before. Maybe I should go to the
dentist. Someone else might suggest I go somewhere else.

Sorry.

Fritz

At 05:07 PM 12/14/95 -0800, Pam Palmer wrote:
>Fritz-
>
>I do not think that "the City of Moscow WANTS developers to act this way".
>Gary Presol will be giving a report to Public Works at 7 a.m. on Monday
>(Dec. 18) on the status of the Erosion Control language that he has been
>working on. Before the Council acts on anything, it needs to go through
>the Technical Code Review committee. I believe that it will help the
>Council to have this kind of technical review before we decide to make a
>new law.
>
>I also do not agree that "On the Palouse, local governments simply do not
>care about erosion or the water pollution that results from erosion."
>
>Pam Palmer
>Chair, Public Works Committee
>Moscow City Council
>
>
>
> On 12/14/95, Fritz Knorr wrote:
>>
>>Perhaps in the interim, there could be a site erosion control code in the
>>Moscow and Latah building codes. The EPA got involved because there is no
>>local law against what happened. The is no erosion control element in any
>>local laws.
>>
>>On the Palouse, local governments simply do not care about erosion or the
>>water pollution that results from erosion.
>>
>>In this case, the developer followed and obeyed ALL local code and
>>regulations. He did not break any local code or regulation. The City of
>>Moscow WANTS developers to act this way.
>>
>>Fritz
>
>
>


This archive courtesy of:
First Step Internet