Fritz should monitor the paper for the next several days for the
story his apparent faux pas generates.
Best,
Susan Palmer
On Tue, 20 Jun 1995, Bill London wrote:
> Can anyone explain how Greg's comments were given to the daily news?
> I am trying to understand this new medium of exchange we are
> using. Is this a party-line conversation, open to the 50 or so
> subscribers, or is this a public forum where we all are making public
> comments ready for use in news accounts?
> Greg was commenting upon a public document in a way that could be
> construed as public comment, but I really don't see his posting as that.
> To me, these messages are not for public dissemination. I would have
> restrained myself from my usual mumbling had I known it could appear in
> print.
> I hope someone explains how this occurred, and what the rules are
> here, and what I can expect in the future. BL
>