vision2020
Re: unauthorized actions on V2020
- To: Scott Dredge <sdredge@yahoo.com>, vision2020@moscow.com
 
- Subject: Re: unauthorized actions on V2020
 
- From: thansen@moscow.com
 
- Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 23:33:07 GMT
 
- Resent-Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 16:20:57 -0700 (PDT)
 
- Resent-From: vision2020@moscow.com
 
- Resent-Message-ID: <wPdK5B.A.zbJ.Wz1p9@whale2.fsr.net>
 
- Resent-Sender: vision2020-request@moscow.com
 
And on the other hand, I always lie, I NEVER EVER tell the truth.
If the above statement is true, then it (within itself) is a lie, such that I 
always tell the truth.  If the above statement is the truth, then it (within 
itself) is the truth, such that I always lie.  And so on and so on and so on 
and . . .
Take care,
Tom Hansen
Moscow
> Also, Mr. Stambler has stated that he is a Christian
> and that he never lies.  NEVER.
> 
> --- Donovan Arnold <donovanarnold@hotmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I happen to believe Mr. Stambler intentions were noble
> for three reasons.
> 1) His email was listed as one of the ones that was
> unsubscribed. It would not make sense for him to
> unsubscribe himself intentionally. However it does
> make sense he would not want his emails always coming
> back to him.
> 2) It would be more productive in attempts to do
> something malicious to subscribe people you don't like
> to other boards and emails lists.
> 3) It would be more troublesome to unsubscribe people
> then it would be for them to resubscribe. I mean
> really, where is the damage here, three seconds of
> your life?
> Thanks!
> 
> 
> > Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 00:36:26 -0700
> > To: vision2020@moscow.com
> > From: David Camden-Britton <davidcb@turbonet.com>
> > Subject: Re: unauthorized actions on V2020
> > 
> 
> 
> Rather than suggesting criminal action, accept this as
> a problem with
> unsecured lists. It is certainly annoying, but as this
> is not a company
> mailing list, or other form of e-commerce, where's the
> damage?
> 
> Let's not escalate an annoyance by an, apparently,
> vindictive individual
> into something more. 
> Previously, Warren Hayman wrote:
> Isn't a UI password etc required
> for using the UI system in such a way? Is Mr.
> Stambler therefore an employee? Doesn't such an action
> (assuming
> intentional) at least border on criminal/civil
> liabilities?
> 
> David Camden-Britton
> davidcb@turbonet.com
> 
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More
> http://faith.yahoo.com
> 
---------------------------------------------
This message was sent by First Step Internet.
           http://www.fsr.net/
  
  
  
Back to TOC