RE: epithets

["Dale Courtney" <dmcourtn@moscow.com>]

Tom Hanson wrote: 

> I could continue this infantile whining back and forth with 
> Mr. Courtney or I can do as I suggested earlier and use my delete key.

Ah, but you don't delete; you reply (and continue to whine)...
 
> Using my delete key should be construed as an act on my part 
> to reflect that although I disagree with what Mr. Courtney is 
> trying to say, he has every right to say it.

That's mighty kind of you -- extending my constitutional right to me.

> Should Mr. Courtney desire to use any other of my quotations, 
> he may feel free to, provided he quotes me accurately (an 
> attribute I do not necessarily credit to him).  He attempts 
> to be funny (or, at minimum, amusing) and somewhat 
> informative.  He is neither.

But I *am* using your original quote. 

"Would you allow an Aryan to be free to be himself?" You said "no" once
before on this list.

http://lists.fsr.com/vision2020/2002/0209/msg00021.html

What we have is an equivocation on the meaning of "free". 

> Free to be you and me (the original quote),

The problem is, you don't *really* believe it or mean it. Hence, my
stating in my sig line what you really intend in yours.

Tom, tell me that an Aryan is free to be himself and I will gladly stop
mocking your sig line. Until then I remain,

Dale Courtney
Moscow, Idaho
Free to be me, free to be you (as long as you agree with Tom Hansen...)