vision2020
Re: free enterprise
- To: Douglas <dougwils@moscow.com>, vision2020@moscow.com
- Subject: Re: free enterprise
- From: thansen@moscow.com
- Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 18:00:03 GMT
- Resent-Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 10:48:47 -0700 (PDT)
- Resent-From: vision2020@moscow.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <kf300C.A.9aB.8VKk9@whale2.fsr.net>
- Resent-Sender: vision2020-request@moscow.com
Visionaires -
Just for your own edification, my analogy of homophobes to racists was only to
suggest that their (homophobes and racists) hates/fears are similar in that
they are focused toward a particular segment of society without getting to know
that particular segment. I did not (in any fashion) intend to suggest that
homophobes are racist.
With that said, I shall take my time out.
Take care,
Tom Hansen
Moscow
> <html>
> Dear visionaries,<br><br>
> Carl Westburg is quite right. I forgot to sign my post. I was bad. Can I
> still come to your restaurant?<br><br>
> In response to Ted Moffett, I fully understand that the current legal
> situation makes a distinction between speech and restaurant management. I
> want to know why. How come? By what standard? What is so magical about
> speech? Why is the First Amendment misunderstood and then absolutized?
> Why is the Tenth Amendment ignored? Give me an argument, not a court
> decision. I know about the court decisions, because the court decisions
> are causing the problem I am resisting. If behavioral patterns have the
> same protections on someone else's private property as does race, then
> where do we stop? Remember the basic question, which is <i>by what
> standard? </i>Do I have to serve neo-Nazis? homosexuals? heterosexuals?
> Congressmen? quilters? kleptomaniacs? smokers? Masons? barefoot
> teenagers? topless women? men with Tourette's syndrome?
> tree-huggers?<br><br>
> Melynda Huskey asks for us to remember to be as civil as we can be in our
> exchanges -- which I am certainly happy to do. Remember, my use of
> "jerk" was applied to the hypothetical racist, the one that
> some folks on this list like to assume resides a millimeter beneath my
> argument. So please remember that civility includes refusing to rush to
> the facile equation (for progressives) of theological conservatism with
> hate speech, racism, and so on.<br><br>
> Cordially,<br><br>
> Douglas Wilson<br>
> </html>
>
---------------------------------------------
This message was sent by First Step Internet.
http://www.fsr.net/
Back to TOC