vision2020
Re: against ordinance 2002-13
Janesta,
As much as I respect your right to feel that way and I really do....
you could also CHOOSE to not read Vision2020 today.
Today's actually day a *personal* loss for me and I still am not
willing to miss the opportunity to stand up for this issue.
My feelings are that today is a day to open our minds and hearts
NOT shut down...
-karri
Date sent: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 11:44:31 -0700
From: "J.Sullivan" <jsullivan@moscow.com>
Send reply to: jsullivan@moscow.com
To: Karri Fedale <karrim@belle.lib.uidaho.edu>
Copies to: vision2020@moscow.com
Subject: Re: against ordinance 2002-13
Just for today, please......
I for one, on this solemn day of remembrance, would appreciate it if you would be so kind as to give
this topic a rest.
Thank you,
Janesta Sullivan
rri Fedale wrote:
> I'm against Ordinance 2002-13! It's an embarrassment that our
> city council would choose to accept such a sweeping ordinance to
> deal with a temporary situation.
> -Karri Fedale, 828 Truman, Moscow
>
> Date sent: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 22:44:48 +0000
> From: "Muscovites for Equal Rights" <idahomer@hotmail.com>
> To: vision2020@moscow.com
> Subject: Vote: Are you for or against ordinance 2002-13?
>
> Considering no one wants to publically debate us on this issue, considering
> about 30 were in favor and about 130 were against the ordinance when the
> sample survey web site was up, considering Doug Wilson has said he'd be
> happy to suggest we ditch the ordinance, and considering Doug Jones is not
> a proponant either, I am wondering what your views regarding this ordinance
> are?
>
> Sec. 1-16. Public Nudity.
>
> A. Definitions:
> 1. Pubescent or postpubescent female breast. This shall include the entire.................
..
>
> ------- End of forwarded message -------
Back to TOC