vision2020
RE: curious about the vote
- To: <vision2020@moscow.com>
- Subject: RE: curious about the vote
- From: "Dale Courtney" <dmcourtn@moscow.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 08:48:10 -0700
- Importance: Normal
- In-Reply-To: <001501c25854$1e4c01b0$6664a8c0@orca>
- Resent-Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 08:49:43 -0700 (PDT)
- Resent-From: vision2020@moscow.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <VY3A9D.A.EEU.UShf9@whale2.fsr.net>
- Resent-Sender: vision2020-request@moscow.com
> Despite your apparent dislike of building codes, zoning and
> other government restrictions on the use of property you
> seem, from previous posts, to be saying that dictating how a
> person can dress on their property is a legitimate government action.
>
> Have I misunderstood you?
You have misunderstood me. It's ridiculous that we need to have an
ordinance that tells people to keep their clothes on.
What I find amusing is that people scream for the right to expose
themselves to others on their property, but don't find it at all
contradictory that they already have no rights with their property.
Sigh.
Dale Courtney
Moscow, Idaho
Free to be me, free to be you (as long as you agree with Tom...)
Back to TOC