RE: curious about the vote

["Dale Courtney" <dmcourtn@moscow.com>]

> There are a *lot* of things that "sweep onto private 
> property". A couple
> > are not allowed to copulate on their front yard in plain view just 
> > because it is private property.
> 
> I reply:
> 
> Are you suggesting that the community has a legitimate 
> interest in curtailing private property rights?  If so where 
> is the line between legitimate interest and coersion?

ROTFL!  You have *got* to be kidding me? We haven't had private property
rights in 50 years!

Tell me, can you make an addition to your house without getting the
government's permission?  I know people who have had the county come out
and stop them putting a *deck* on their house.

You call *that* private property rights? 

I'm willing to discuss *real* private property rights, when we're ready
to discuss getting past the absurd laws that we currently have that say
we have no "rights" already.

You hit a nerve...

Dale Courtney
Moscow, Idaho
Free to be me, free to be you (as long as you agree with Tom...)