vision2020
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index] [Subject Index]

Re: Depleted Uranium



The World Health Organization does not describe depleted uranium as being particularly harmful either, though it appears there are issues involving DU that may need additonal research.
 
Bruce Livington
 
    Fact Sheets

   Fact Sheet N° 257
Revised April 2001

DEPLETED URANIUM

Uranium

  • Uranium is a silver-white, lustrous, dense, natural, weakly radioactive element. It is ubiquitous throughout the natural environment, and is found in varying but small amounts in rocks, soils, water, air, plants, animals and in all human beings.
  • On average, approximately 90 µg (micrograms) of uranium exist in the human body from normal intakes of water, food and air. About 66% is found in the skeleton, 16% in the liver, 8% in the kidneys and 10% in other tissues.
  • Natural uranium consists of a mixture of three radioactive isotopes which are identified by the mass numbers 238U(99.27% by mass), 235U(0.72%) and 234U(0.0054%).
  • Uranium is used primarily in nuclear power plants. However, most reactors require uranium in which the 235U content is enriched from 0.72% to about 3%.

Depleted uranium

  • The uranium remaining after removal of the enriched fraction contains about 99.8% 238U, 0.25% of 235U and 0.001% 234U by mass; this is referred to as depleted uranium or DU.
  • DU is weakly radioactive and a radiation dose from it would be about 60% of that from purified natural uranium with the same mass.
  • The behaviour of uranium and DU in the body is identical radiologically and chemically.
  • Spent uranium fuel from nuclear reactors is sometimes reprocessed in plants used for natural uranium enrichment. Some reactor-created radio-isotopes can consequently contaminate the reprocessing equipment and the DU. Under these conditions another uranium isotope, 236U, may be present in the DU together with very small amounts of the transuranic elements plutonium, americium and neptunium and the fission product technetium-99. However, on the basis of the concentrations of these radio-isotopes found in DU, the increase in radiation dose from uptake by the human body would be less than 1%.

Applications of depleted uranium

  • The main civilian uses of DU include counterweights in aircraft, radiation shields in medical radiation therapy machines and containers for the transport of radioactive materials.
  • Due to its high density, about twice that of lead, and other properties, DU is used in munitions designed to penetrate armour plate and for protection of military vehicles such as tanks.

Exposure to uranium and depleted uranium

  • The average annual intakes of uranium by adults are estimated to be 460 m g from ingestion and 0.59 m g from inhalation.
  • Under most circumstances, use of DU will make a negligible contribution to the overall natural background levels of uranium in the environment. The greatest potential for DU exposure will follow a conflict where DU munitions are used.
  • A recent United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) report giving field measurements taken around selected impact sites in Kosovo (Federal Republic of Yugoslavia) indicates that contamination by DU in the environment was localized to a few tens of metres around impact sites. Contamination by DU dusts to local vegetation and water supplies was found to be extremely low. Thus, the possibility of significant exposure to the local populations was found to be very low.
  • However, levels of DU may be significantly raised over background levels in close proximity to DU contaminating events. Over the days and years following such an event, the contamination will become dispersed into the wider natural environment. People living or working in affected areas can inhale dusts and can consume contaminated food and drinking water.
  • There is a possibility that people near an aircraft crash may be exposed to DU dusts if counterweights were to combust on impact. Significant exposure to people from this situation would be rare. Exposures to clean-up and emergency workers following aircraft accidents are possible, but normal occupational protection measures would prevent any significant exposure occurring.

DU exposure pathways

  • Individuals can be exposed to DU in the same way they are routinely exposed to natural uranium, i.e. through inhalation, ingestion, dermal contact or injury (e.g. embedded fragments).
  • Each of these exposure situations needs to be assessed to determine any potential health consequence.
  • The relative contribution from each of these pathways to the total DU uptake into the body depends on the physical and chemical nature of the DU, as well as the level and duration of exposure.

Intake of depleted uranium

  • Intake by ingestion can occur if drinking water or food is contaminated by DU. In addition, the ingestion of soil by children via geophagia (the practice of eating earth, clay, chalk, etc.) or hand-to-mouth activities is also an important pathway.
  • Intake by inhalation can occur following the use of DU munitions during or when DU deposits in the environment are re-suspended in the atmosphere by wind or other forms of disturbance. Accidental inhalation may also occur as a consequence of a fire in a DU storage facility, an aircraft crash, or the decontamination of vehicles from within or close to conflict areas.
  • Intake by contact exposure of DU through the skin is very low and relatively unimportant.
  • Intake from wound contamination or embedded fragments in skin tissues allows DU to enter the systemic circulation.

Absorption of depleted uranium

  • Most (>95%) uranium entering the body via inhalation or ingestion is not absorbed, but is eliminated via the faeces.
  • Of the uranium that is absorbed into the blood, approximately 67% will be filtered by the kidney and excreted in the urine within 24 hours; this amount increases to 90% within a few days.
  • Typical gut absorption rates for uranium in food and water are about 2% for soluble uranium compounds and down to 0.2% for insoluble uranium compounds.

Health effects of exposure to depleted uranium

DU has both chemical and radiological toxicity with the two important target organs being the kidneys and the lungs.

  • In the kidneys, the proximal tubules are considered to be the main site of potential damage. Long-term studies of workers chronically exposed to uranium have reported impairment of the kidneys that depended on the level of exposure. There is also some evidence that this impairment may return to normal once the source of excessive uranium exposure has been removed.
  • In a number of studies on uranium miners, an increased risk of lung cancer has been demonstrated, but this has been attributed to exposure from radon decay products. There is a possibility of lung tissue damage leading to a risk of lung cancer if a high enough radiation dose results from insoluble DU compounds remaining in the lungs over a prolonged period (many years).
  • Erythema (superficial inflammation of the skin) or other effects on the skin should not occur even if DU is held against the skin for prolonged periods (weeks). There is no established data to suggest that skin cancer results from skin contact with uranium dusts.
  • No consistent or confirmed adverse effects have been reported for the skeleton or liver. However, few studies have been conducted.
  • No reproductive or developmental effects have been reported in humans, but studies are limited.
  • Although uranium released from embedded fragments may accumulate in the central nervous system (CNS) tissue and some animal and human studies are suggestive of effects on CNS function, it is difficult to draw firm conclusions from the studies.

Maximum radiation exposure limits

The following doses, from the International Basic Safety Standards agreed by WHO in 1996, are in addition to those from normal background exposures.

  • The general public should not receive a dose of more than 1 millisievert (mSv) in a year. In special circumstances, an effective dose of up to 5 mSv in a single year is permitted provided that the average dose over five consecutive years does not exceed 1 mSv per year. An equivalent dose to the skin should not exceed 50 mSv in a year.
  • Occupational exposure should not exceed an effective dose of 20 mSv per year averaged over five consecutive years or an effective dose of 50 mSv in any single year. An equivalent dose to the extremities (hands and feet) or the skin should not surpass 500 mSv in a year.

Guidance on exposure based on chemical and radiological toxicity

The World Health Organization (WHO) has guidelines for determining the values of health-based exposure limits or tolerable intakes (TIs) for chemical substances. The TIs given below are applicable to long-term exposure in the general public (as opposed to workers). In single and short-term exposures, higher exposure levels may be tolerated without adverse effects.

  • The general public's intake via inhalation or ingestion of soluble DU compounds should be based on a tolerable intake value of 0.5 µg per kg of body weight per day. This leads to an air concentration of 1 µg/m3. For ingestion, this would be about 11 mg/y for an average adult.
  • It would be appropriate to reduce the TI for intake of insoluble DU compounds to 0.5 µg per kg of body weight per day so that compatibility is achieved with the public radiation dose limit. When the solubility characteristics of the uranium species are not known, which is often the case in exposure to depleted uranium, it would be prudent to apply the more stringent tolerable intakes, i.e., 0.5 µg per kg of body weight per day for oral exposure.
  • Uranium compounds with low absorption are markedly less nephrotoxic, and a tolerable intake via ingestion of 5 µg per kg of body weight per day is applicable.

Monitoring and treatment of exposed individuals

  • For the general population, neither civilian nor military use of DU is likely to produce exposures to DU much above normal background levels produced by uranium. Therefore, an exposure assessment for DU will normally not be required.
  • When an individual is suspected of being exposed to DU at a level significantly above the normal background level, an assessment of DU exposure may be required. This is best achieved by analysis of daily urine excretion. The amount of DU in the urine is determined from the 235U:238U ratio, obtained using sensitive mass spectrometric techniques. Faecal measurement can give useful information on intake if samples are collected soon after exposure (a few days).
  • External radiation measurements over the chest, using a whole-body radiation monitor for determining the amount of DU in the lungs, have limited application since they require specialist facilities and can only assess relatively large amounts of DU in the lungs.
  • There are no specific means to decrease the absorption of uranium from the gastrointestinal tract or lungs, or increase its excretion. Thus, general methods appropriate to heavy metal poisoning could be applied. Similarly, there is no specific treatment for uranium poisoning and the patient should be treated based on the symptoms observed. Dialysis may be helpful in extreme cases of kidney damage.

Recommendations

  • Levels of contamination in food and drinking water could rise in affected areas after some years and should be monitored where it is considered that there is a reasonable possibility of significant quantities of DU entering the ground water or food chain.
  • Where possible, clean-up operations in impact zones should be undertaken where there are substantial numbers of radioactive projectiles remaining and where qualified experts deem contamination levels to be unacceptable. If very high concentrations of DU dust or metal fragments are present, then areas may need to be cordoned off until removal can be accomplished. Disposal of DU should come under appropriate national or international recommendations for use of radioactive materials.
  • Young children could receive greater exposure to DU when playing in or near DU impact sites. Typical hand-to-mouth activity could lead to high DU ingestion from contaminated soil. Necessary preventative measures should be taken.
  • Individuals who believe they have had excessive intakes of DU should consult their medical practitioner for an examination and treatment of any symptoms. General screening or monitoring for possible DU related health effects in populations living in conflict areas where DU was used is not called for.

Research

In April 2001, WHO published a monograph entitled Depleted Uranium: Sources, Exposures and Health Effects. It is the product of a review of the best available scientific literature on uranium and depleted uranium. The monograph provides a framework for identifying the likely consequences of public and occupational exposure to DU. It is available at:

http://www.who.int/environmental_information/radiation/depleted_uranium.htm.

The monograph identifies a number of future research needs.


For further information, journalists can contact the Office of the Spokesperson, WHO, Geneva. Telephone: (+41 22) 791 2599. Fax: (+41 22) 791 4858. E-mail: inf@who.int. All WHO Press Releases, Fact Sheets and Features as well as other information on this subject can be obtained on the Internet on the WHO web site http://www.who.int.

  Press Releases 1999 |  | Press Releases 2000  | Press Releases 2001  | Press Releases 2002
Fact sheets | Information Office  | En français

 © WHO/OMS, 2002  |   Acknowledgements   |  Contact WHO

----- Original Message -----
From: Don Kaag
To: Vision 2020
Sent: Saturday, August 31, 2002 7:42 AM

"I remember reading in the New York Times that the U.S. used armor piercing shells containing depleted uranium when we bombed Kosovo (remember that?) The area is seriously contaminated with radioactive material now. . ."

Melynda Huskey

Visionaries:

Sigh. Now we get into my area of expertise.

No, Melynda, the DU shells from the 20mm and 30mm auto cannon we fired in Kosovo did not "seriously contaminate with radioactive material".

DEPLETED uranium! It's about as radioactive as the hands on your watch. The DU rounds are armor penetrators, and they use a depleted uranium alloy because it is the densest metal known to man. So you have an itty-bitty, really fast, really dense, really hard, slug of depleted uranium which will penetrate tank armor. The friction and resistance of the penetration causes it to "spall" (break up into little molten droplets) the inside of the tank armor, and then the droplets rattle around inside blowing stuff up and killing people.

The shells you refer to are on aircraft and used in the guns of armored fighting vehicles like the US's Bradley AFV. We fired very few of them, because our aircraft were under orders to stay high to avoid getting shot down, and cannon like these are generally used for close ground support. Since we didn't get into any significant firefights on the ground in Kosovo, the amount of DU ammo fired in-country was also at a minimum.

It is a different thing if you are harking back to the Persian Gulf War and the stories of battlefield contamination by DU rounds. That was a tank war, and US tanks also fire DU rounds. Since the tank gun on the Abrams M1A is 120mm, vice the 20 to 20 mm of the weapons used in Kosovo, and we fired thousands of them at the Iraqi Army, you are talking about a totally different level of contamination. At that, the only people at risk were troops who crawled around in destroyed Iraqi tanks, and then only because they breathed in the residual DU dust present... and they would have sustained roughly the same symptoms if we had been firing asbestos rounds instead of DU!

As far as I know, not a single US tank fired any rounds in Kosovo.

I rode around in Germany for three and a half years in the 1980's in a tank uploaded with 62 rounds of DU main gun ammunition, and its laminate armor sandwiched with rolled homogeneous steel, ceramic and depleted uranium, and I can assure you that I do not glow in the dark!

Regards,

Don Kaag


JPEG image

GIF image




Back to TOC