vision2020
Middle School/High School Changes
- To: vision2020@moscow.com
- Subject: Middle School/High School Changes
- From: "Melynda Huskey" <mghuskey@hotmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 22:31:13 -0700
- Resent-Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 22:38:35 -0700 (PDT)
- Resent-From: vision2020@moscow.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <ldDZL.A.wlD.YXdY9@whale2.fsr.net>
- Resent-Sender: vision2020-request@moscow.com
I'm just beginning to think about the proposed changes at the secondary
level for Moscow School District, and I'm dismayed.
A quick review of the research on high schools demonstrates, as Tom Gregory
puts it, "since 1970, essentially all research favors the creation of small
high schools." Some advantages of small schools? Less crime and violence,
fewer discipline problems, lower student tardiness and absenteeism, and less
substance abuse and tobacco use by students; lower dropout rates and higher
graduation rates; and higher and more varied extracurricular participation.
Small schools are more effective in poorer communities and make achievement
dramatically more equitable. Research suggests that many schools are too
large to serve students well, and smaller schools are widely needed,
particularly in impoverished communities. (This information is drawn from a
number of studies reviewed in the ERIC database--search keywords "high
school" "size" and "research" for much more information.)
Why are we planning to build a bigger, more isolated high school when the
research is clear that a smaller, centrally located school would serve
students better? And why would we spend millions of scarce dollars on a new
building instead of wisely using the one we already own? If enrollment
numbers are declining, do we need a larger school?
I'd like to hear from school board members, or anybody else in the know,
about the research that's gone into the school usage decisions of the last
year or so--from ending neighborhood elementary schools in favor of the new
age-segregated schools, to increasing the junior high population by adding
another grade to a school many students and parents already experience as
large,impersonal, and unresponsive, to building a new isolated facility for
the 9-12 graders. All of these decisions appear to be deeply
counter-intuitive, as well as unsupported by research findings at a national
level.
I have never voted against a levy since I first exercised my franchise, but
unless the district can produce some superb justifications for these
proposals, I expect to check the "no" box for the first time.
It's not a feeling I like.
Melynda Huskey
_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com
Back to TOC