Moscow School Board election

[Jack Porter <jporter@moscow.com>]

John, you must not have been paying attention.  I hope you will read the 
articles in yesterday's Tribune and Daily News.  Read Tim's brochure on the 
CQE website:  www.moscowcqe.com  Go back and read Tim's letter to Vision 
2020 a day or two ago.

Tim was prepared for a campaign against Mike Curley, so I don't think he 
can be accused of avoiding debate or being married to the status quo.  If 
the write-in candidate is being coy about his own views, that's not Tim's 
fault.

Jack

>X-From_: vision2020-request@moscow.com  Thu May 16 08:59:46 2002
>Resent-Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 08:55:46 -0700 (PDT)
>X-Authentication-Warning: whale2.fsr.net: slist set sender to 
>vision2020-request@moscow.com using -f
>From: "John Danahy" <JDANAHY@turbonet.com>
>To: <vision2020@moscow.com>
>Subject: Re: Moscow School Board election
>Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 08:54:08 -0700
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
>Resent-From: vision2020@moscow.com
>X-Mailing-List: <vision2020@moscow.com> archive/latest/1478
>X-Loop: vision2020@moscow.com
>Resent-Sender: vision2020-request@moscow.com
>X-postinispam-levels:     (C:64.7177 M:96.0930 P:98.1618 S:74.7367 )
>
>I have yet to see any real discussion of the issues facing the school
>district either in print or on this site.  Instead, I have seen the various
>supporters of the CQE attempt to run a single issue campaign based on one
>candidate's religious affiliation.  This clearly seems to me a smoke screen
>designed to hide from public view the other candidates support for status
>quo in the district.
>Why should anyone vote at all?
>
>John Danahy
>jdanahy@turbonet.com
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Jack Porter" <jporter@moscow.com>
>To: <vision2020@moscow.com>
>Cc: <jackp@moscow.com>
>Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 6:34 PM
>Subject: Moscow School Board election
>
>
> > There's one filing deadline to have your name printed on the ballot, and
> > another deadline to have write-in votes counted.  This year they fell on
> > April 19 and May 7.  So neither candidate is "illegal."
> >
> > I would be interested in hearing the write-in candidate explain why he
> > didn't file by the first deadline.   Too disorganized?  Too
> > uninformed?  Not a serious candidate?  Acting out a childish prank that he
> > and his college buddies cooked up at the last moment?  Or is this a
> > premeditated strategy to catch the public napping while his zealous
> > supporters quietly get their voters to the polls?
> >
> > Jack Porter
> >
> > >X-From_: vision2020-request@moscow.com  Wed May 15 15:22:38 2002
> > >Resent-Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 15:21:12 -0700 (PDT)
> > >X-Authentication-Warning: whale2.fsr.net: slist set sender to
> > >vision2020-request@moscow.com using -f
> > >From: "Dale Courtney" <dmcourtn@moscow.com>
> > >To: <vision2020@moscow.com>
> > >Subject: RE: Moscow School Board election
> > >Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 15:20:05 -0700
> > >X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.3416
> > >Importance: Normal
> > >Resent-From: vision2020@moscow.com
> > >X-Mailing-List: <vision2020@moscow.com> archive/latest/1463
> > >X-Loop: vision2020@moscow.com
> > >Resent-Sender: vision2020-request@moscow.com
> > >X-postinispam-levels:     (C:64.7177 M:96.0930 P:94.8529 S:75.6322 )
> > >
> > >Ken wrote:
> > >
> > > > Third, one candidate is on the ballot and one is not.  I'm
> > > > urging a vote for
> > > > the candidate who filed his nominating petition before the
> > > > deadline and is actively campaigning for the job -- Tim
> > > > Kinkeade.
> > >
> > >If Beauchamp is on the ballet illegally, then this is a "no-brainer."
> > >He's an illegal candidate, right?
> > >
> > >Dale
> >
> >