vision2020
Re: Palouse Mall landscaping
Mr. Bird,
In regard to the points you make below, I would offer the following
clarifications.
The so-called last-minute information you mention (i.e., plant sizes
and removal/relocations) was provided at the request of the Community
Forester, and was in excess of the information originally requested.
None of this constituted new information, but rather it was provided
to lessen the work of staff in their process of review. All of this
information was either provided previously, was contained within the
plans, or was accessible by visiting the site.
It is grossly inaccurate to refer to the planned tree removals as
mature and healthy. An on-site inspection of the trees will reveal
that they are predominantly in poor health, damaged, of a noxious
variety, recently planted, saplings or at their formative years. The
clear minority are mature. Regarding relocations, accepted
horticultural practices make this a viable option. This has been
corroborated by the University of Idaho Arboretae Committee and
maintenance and operations staff reviews, as well as by the City
Community Forester. Specific steps to assure survival will be made
in concert with the latter branch of staff (no pun intended).
I can not say to what extent you reviewed the view lines shown on the
latest plans, however as the individual who identified the sight
lines I can say that all but one of them are based upon preexisting
sight lines. Similarly, a landscape that is not fastidiously
maintained to a set standard of forms and sizes (like the current
site) will result in an appearance that changes. There is no known
landscape form or character for this site because there is no known
landscape plan. As such, designing what is the best possible
landscape has been the goal of this project, and not to resurrect a
past form that resulted from haphazard planting and unchecked growth.
For your question about what the justifications were for the design I
would refer you to previous project presentations and Council
minutes. The Council and City staff were given brief narratives
reiterating these points as well. The current version of the plan
responds to suggestions made at the previous presentation to Council,
including but not limited to a reduction in the number of Scotch
Pines removed and an increase in evergreen trees added. Thus it
represents a plan that has been changed in the interim to address
requests by Council and City staff. It is not a new plan.
I hope this information will assist you understanding the true nature
of this plan.
s
>Dear council members,
>Thank you for your decision to delay a vote on the Palouse Mall's
>landscaping. As the questions raised at the meeting Monday night
>indicated, there was too much last-minute information presented to
>allow thorough and thoughtful consideration of the plan.
>
>I remain opposed to the removal of mature and healthy trees from the
>buffer strip along State Highway 8. I do not accept the University
>of Idaho's position that "view lines" need to be provided to
>businesses at the mall, or that the proposal only widens existing
>openings. Many of these openings did not exist before the illegal
>removal of vegetation in November of 2000.
>
>While I applaud the proposal to increase the number of trees within
>the mall parking lot and along Farm Road, I fail to see the
>justification for removing and/or relocating this many trees from
>the buffer strip. Please review the proposal carefully before your
>decision on March 11.
>Sincerely,
>Kenton Bird
>517 East B St.
>Moscow
>
>
>
>
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com
--
* * * * * * * *
Sean Michael, Ph.D.
Program Coordinator / Assistant Professor
Dept. of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture
Washington State University
149 Johnson/ Pullman 99164-6414
509.335.1470 / .8690 F
http://hortla.wsu.edu/la.html
Note: this email is intended solely for the recipient(s) to whom it
is sent. The contents may not be distributed, in part or in whole,
without the author's consent.
Back to TOC