vision2020
Levy Comments
- To: vision2020@moscow.com
- Subject: Levy Comments
- From: John Davis <jcdavis@uidaho.edu>
- Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 19:01:02 -0800
- Resent-Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 19:01:21 -0800 (PST)
- Resent-From: vision2020@moscow.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <hj8Ke.A.d8T.rzI87@whale.fsr.net>
- Resent-Sender: vision2020-request@moscow.com
I too am concerned with comments by French in the MDN and Danahy on the
vision listserve, and am disturbed for several reasons.
First, French calls for 'efficient' schools, based I suppose on some sort
of efficient factory-production model. Well, we just can't do that very
easily with people; especially given the mandate of American public
education: a comprehensive successful educational experience for all
students in a safe, non-threatening environment. It is no small feat to
accomplish this task, given the multitude of variables our professional
educators manage (ranging from learning styles and abilities to concerns
over issues which socially impact their students). While I agree that
there are some fiscal parameters that our district can and will examine
from a cost-effective standpoint (technology, transportation, energy
consumption, etc.) AND knowing that the majority of funds are committed to
salaries I, and I am sure many others, are quite content with paying an
additional tax of $.50 to $1.00 per day to ensure that we retain small
class sizes and the supportive, nurturing environment that is enabled by
such schools. Keep students in schools within their respective
neighborhoods. . . and if we have some variation between schools,
departments, and grade levels regarding class size, so be it.
Second, Danahy claims that our schools are not effective. . . and even
"stoops so low" (to use his words) to engage in accusations against a very
professional group of individuals--yes, our community teachers. You state
strong opinions, but they appear to be just that--baseless opinions, not
positions supported by evidence. Speaking of evidence, where is
yours? Even a shred? Have you interviewed and categorized all the parents
and children who attend schools other than MSD? Do you examine test
scores, both standardized and pencil-and-paper? Are you familiar with the
post-graduate success rate of our students in business, industry,
vocational programs or college? Are you at all familiar with what our
children can do? Are you even remotely aware of the quality environment
our children have in this lovely, provincial community? I suspect not. I
am not even going to portray my children's experiences, although, suffice
to say that it is far more positive than your account. . . AND my children
had experience with MSD and a local private school. It seems as though you
harbor some hostility regarding the teachers. . . yes, there is an apparent
long-standing 'issue' between the MSD and trustees. . . but, it is time to
grow up. I expect my current, future, and past trustees to be professional
in every sense of the word. Resentment of the past can only lead to
continued conflict in the future.
I am proud of all of our community schools. . . ALL of them. They are
staffed by well-educated, well-meaning, bright, articulate professionals
who work hard to help us help our children be successful in any and all
endeavors they choose. Do they make mistakes? Of course. Do
I? You? Yes, we all do. However, it is our responsibility to learn from
our mistakes and move forward.
John Davis
Back to TOC