[Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] |
[Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Author Index] | [Subject Index] |
I agree
with much of this but you are assuming that the decisions are made by elected officials…
this in fact is not the case! Sure you have the figure heads who put on a show…
you even have a few dedicated people on the city council… but the one who controls
the information controls the outcome and the controller of information is
nearly always not an elected official.
“Your brother
in arms”,
Shahab…
-----Original
Message-----
From: Archie
[mailto:archie@moscow.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001
8:30 PM
To: vision2020@moscow.com
Subject: Re: Summer thoughts on
Moscow governance
Why
does the government spend billions on roads every year and then want the
railroads to "pay for themselves"? Who paid for the dams, which
forced many families to leave their homes when the water rose (mine
included)? I think the answer is simple. GM has a powerful lobby,
railroad passengers are not well heeled. Corporate farmers elect the
officials who claim to protect family farms, while putting them out of business
with many policies. Thus, the freeway system has been justified as a
military transport system, while railroads, tremendously more effective in
moving troops, are dismantled. Native fish are sacrificed to corporate
greed while our heritage goes down the drain.
Who
pays to finance the campaigns of our city leaders? If locals make
the contributions, locals have the ear of the officials. This is often
the case, in my opinion. The higher the office, the less influence the
general public has on the outcome. It's not enough to leave a bequest to
the city "for youth". It might be better to finance a few
election campaigns.