vision2020
Re: Anonymity
- To: "Vision 2020" <vision2020@moscow.com>
- Subject: Re: Anonymity
- From: "M H" <kmhowe@moscow.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2000 22:25:34 -0800
- References: <e8.1a2d98b.25dc7f97@aol.com>
- Resent-Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2000 22:21:17 -0800 (PST)
- Resent-From: vision2020@moscow.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <sgmev.A.wfQ.KN5q4@whale.fsr.net>
- Resent-Sender: vision2020-request@moscow.com
I agree. The IDEAS are important. Let your words speak for themselves &
the less IDENTITIES the better.
M Howe
----- Original Message -----
From: <Erikus4@aol.com>
To: <vision2020@moscow.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2000 2:32 PM
Subject: Re: Anonymity
> > If we're going to drift away from that policy
> >of taking responsibility, we'll drift away from
> >fairness and consideration and the result
> >will be people drifing away from Vision 2020
> >in a big way.
>
> We seem to be doing rather well. JS M has been around for a while and
> anarchy hasn't come to Vision2020.
>
> Isn't Vision about ideas? How does identity change the idea?
>
> Yeah, it's "nice" that we know who these people are, but if someone starts
> trashing posts because they lack any information which identifies the
poster
> (which could easily be fabricated) then we lose a whole lot more.
>
> E. O'Daniel
>
>
>
>
Back to TOC