Re: Vision statement and Pullman/Whitman Co.

["bill london" <bill_london@hotmail.com>]

S-
I think that Pullman/Whitman Co. is included in the existing statement.
Also, in a not-so-generous spirit, and with full acknowledgement of the real 
differences between Moscow and Pullman, I have always thought that we named 
this Moscow Vision 2020 for a reason--namely, that it focuses on Moscow and 
its genesis was Moscow.
Other ideas?
BL


>From: "Stephen Cooke" <scooke@uidaho.edu>
>Reply-To: <scooke@uidaho.edu>
>To: "Vision2020 Listserver" <vision2020@moscow.com>
>Subject: Vision statement and Pullman/Whitman Co.
>Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2000 08:36:25 -0800
>
>Dear Visionaries,
>  I just read the V2020 vision statement on the homepage.  I noticed that 
>#4
>states
>"To foster cooperation among (and public involvement with) the agencies and
>organizations that plan for and make decisions about the future of Moscow
>and Latah County."
>
>Given the interdependence of Moscow-Pullman and Latah-Whitman Co.s, and
>given the number of people on the list from Whitman co.,
>I suggest that the vision statement be amended to read:
>
>"To foster cooperation among (and public involvement with) the agencies and
>organizations that plan for and make decisions about the future of Moscow
>and Latah County, Idaho and Pullman, Whitman County, Washington."
>
>Any discussion?
>All in favor?
>All opposed?
>
>Steve Cooke
>

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com