vision2020
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index] [Subject Index]

Re: Clinton



I do not think Americans have embraced Clinton or the scandal.  They just
felt it was not an impeachable offense.  The latest Gallup poll showed that
58% of all Americans are glad to see him going.

BTW, I did misread the original posting.  I was tired that night.


----- Original Message -----
From: <Erikus4@aol.com>
To: <vision2020@moscow.com>
Sent: Friday, January 28, 2000 9:08 PM
Subject: Re: Clinton


> > I think you're missing the point. No one is excusing
> >Clinton's behavior.
>
> I don't think I missed ANY point, Tim.
>
> > But if you're offended and embarrased by it, what good
> > does it do to revisit the details here? It was
> > completely unnecessary.
>
> NOT embarassed by it.  Disturbed that the American public embraced the
whole
> thing.  And "revist the details"?  Please.  What the hell list have you
been
> reading?  I posted NO details about the scandal, but made a slight
reference
> to it.
>
> >You're an articulate writer
> >and could have easily made your point just as
> >effectively in any number of other ways.
>
> Fortunately, I choose not to play the stupid games that people seem to
want
> to play.  The "adoption" thread is a good example.
>
> > Why not just go ahead and admit that using explicit
> > language was a mistake?
>
> Because then I'd have to think like the bunch of you?  Offense is in the
mind
> of the offended.  Frankly, I don't care.
>
> > I don't believe the post in question--which many
> > understandably found out of place--lends much
> > credibility to your other posts.
>
> Then you'll make the same mistake that many people do.  A statement
derives
> no validity from of the status of the person who delivers it.  People on
the
> list may discount my posts if they wish.  It isn't my fault if their
thinking
> is fouled up.
>
> E. O'Daniel
> IDAHO!
>
> Watch it, Tim.  I know where your carrel is...  ; )
>
>




Back to TOC