vision2020
Fwd: RE: Do You Want Your Family Exposed to Products Made of Ra
- To: "Moscow Vision 2020" <vision2020@moscow.com>
- Subject: Fwd: RE: Do You Want Your Family Exposed to Products Made of Ra
- From: Ken Medlin <dev-plan@moscow.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Nov 99 01:08:45 -0800
- Resent-Date: Thu, 25 Nov 1999 13:09:45 -0800 (PST)
- Resent-From: vision2020@moscow.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <"ofpy9B.A.J0B.0VaP4"@whale.fsr.net>
- Resent-Sender: vision2020-request@moscow.com
Subject: RE: Do You Want Your Family Exposed to Products Made of
Radioac
Sent: 11/29/19 10:43 AM
Received: 11/26/99 1:06 AM
From: Tom von Alten, tva@pobox.com
To: Smart Growth, smartgro@onenw.org -- and Moscow-Pullman lists
===== A message from the 'smartgro' discussion list =====
Thank you for posting information about this action, Jo. I was
interested
to find out more about the subject, and there are some good materials
available on it. Since the CMEP's action alert pointers were somewhat
indirect (and the one given for comments was not correct), anyone
interested may find the following of use:
The index for this proposed rulemaking, currently in the "request for
comments" (RFC) stage:
http://ruleforum.llnl.gov/cgi-bin/rulemake?source=SM_RFC
This includes links for background information, the rulemaking text and
for submitting comments.
The most recent public hearing for which minutes are posted was in
Maryland, on November 1-2. Having looked through all three hearing
summaries, this is probably the best one to start with for general
understanding:
http://ruleforum.llnl.gov/cgi-bin/downloader/SM_RFC_lib/515-0014.htm
The final public hearing is scheduled for Chicago, Dec. 7-8, and comments
must be received by Dec. 22.
The status quo is that recycling of materials from facilities handling
NRC-licensed materials is handled on a case-by-case basis, with a 1974
guideline for a reference (but not a rule). The question is whether to
maintain this status quo, or to establish rules under which materials can
be evaluated to determine proper disposition.
The most likely threshhold (which would correspond with what other
countries that we trade with are doing) is 1 mrem/yr, 300 times lower
than
the US average background radiation. This level is "broadly accepted as
a
trivial dose." Not everyone agrees with this scientific assessment,
however. For example,
http://www.citizen.org/cmep/radmetal/TomPaine.htm
"The Big Picture - The Recycling of Radioactive Materials"
by Wenonah Hauter
"...Unsurprisingly, decades of research shows that exposure to radiation
is a threat to human health. Any exposure to radiation, no matter how
small, results in some health risk. Even diluting radiation through
recycling cannot reduce the risk to society as a whole, because the total
number of people exposed to radiation will increase as more and more
products contain radiation...."
The fact is, a de minimis dose can only constitute a de minimis risk. If
you're concerned about 1 mrem/yr, do not use airline transportation! 1
mrem is about the additional radiation you get in *one hour* at cruising
altitude.
Regardless of your opinion, checking your home for radon is probably the
most important thing you can do if you concerned about radiation effects
on health; radon gas accounts for more than half of average background
exposure.
If you're interested in more information about this issue, I'd be happy
to
respond to inquiries off-list, as two big postings on this subject are
probably plenty for a topic tangential to SmartGrowth.
_____________
Tom von Alten http://pobox.com/~tva
tva@pobox.com
>From slist Thu Nov 25 12:15:59 1999
------------------------
William K. Medlin
Dev-plan associates
930 Kenneth Street
Moscow ID 83843
208/892-0148
dev-plan@moscow.com
Back to TOC