vision2020
Re: 95 & 8 + ID Traffic
- To: "Don Coombs" <dcoombs@uidaho.edu>, "Moscow Vision 2020" <vision2020@moscow.com>, "Smart Growth" <smartgro@onenw.org>
- Subject: Re: 95 & 8 + ID Traffic
- From: Ken Medlin <dev-plan@moscow.com>
- Date: Sun, 12 Sep 99 23:39:24 -0800
- Resent-Date: Sun, 12 Sep 1999 23:31:55 -0700 (PDT)
- Resent-From: vision2020@moscow.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <"wxrhZD.A.pXC.GpJ33"@whale.fsr.net>
- Resent-Sender: vision2020-request@moscow.com
On the data: I have not yet read the entire DOT report to access the
average miles driven. No doubt a truck logs several times more miles than
the average passenger car. The latter covers typically 12,000 miles a
year, and probably a truck 3-4 times that. Still, the factor of urban
congestion (not in Idaho!) across the nation where 70% of the population
now lives in metro areas creates more accident-prone conditions than
does the open road, usually interstates (except in central and northern
Idaho where 2-lane routes are typical). So you have also to consier the
logistics behind the data. As for road time, how can one believe that a
60-66 hour work week for truckers is reasonable? It's a pure function of
"get the goods there ASAP and with as little turn around time as
possible", regardless of the physical and mental stress which such
driving entails. It's the Amrican life style and geographic realities
that demand this kind of treatment. Wd don't have to have all the goodies
and material supports we think ought to come on wheels from all corners
of the country -- the organizational and transportation consequences are
becoming too comples and danger-prone to continue on this route without
review and legislated change. Presumably that's what the DOT study wanted
to find out. But the trucking assn. (ATA) wants to raise the allowable
driving time per week even higher. How can this make sense? Last month
Gov. Whitman of N.J. signed a bill restricting interstate trucks to the
4-lane divided hiways, because so many were "cheating" on weight
requirements by taking secondary and rural routes supposedly to "save
time" (truck industry statement) and to connect from one I-way to
another, greatly congesting small towns and roads and causing undue
accidents (this is what the ATA itself reports but refuses to take
responsibility for)). So all is not well in this industry. Well, happy
motoring, anyway! PS: Last spring I spent a month in Europe, and the
"camions" and "lorries" present jst about the same problems there as here
-- its endemic to over-industrialized communities. Let's step back and
reassess where we are going with all this. Amen!
------------------------
William K. Medlin
Dev-plan associates
930 Kenneth Street
Moscow ID 83843
208/892-0148
dev-plan@moscow.com
Back to TOC