vision2020
Daily News letters
- To: vision2020@moscow.com
- Subject: Daily News letters
- From: "Mike Curley" <curley@CYPHER.TURBONET.COM>
- Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 11:18:57 +0000
- Comments: Authenticated sender is <curley@mail.turbonet.com>
- Priority: normal
- Resent-Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 11:20:52 -0700 (PDT)
- Resent-From: vision2020@moscow.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <"6QYCG.A.PPB.rN4i3"@whale.fsr.net>
- Resent-Sender: vision2020-request@moscow.com
Has anyone else noticed the decline in the number of letters to the editor
published in the Daily News lately? Has the 300 word limit chilled writers--or
caused a lot of letters sent for publication to be excluded?
Although there were many writers with whom I disagreed, I always applauded the
DN's policy of attempting to publish all letters--or when crowded for space
because of a significant issue, of publishing as many as possible.
With the expansion of editorial writers and the decline of public letters, I
know less what the community thinks and see the influence of the few
editorialists increasing. Increasing editorial opinions may be a good think
ultimately, but I see decreasing the opportunities to take issue with the
editorials as a definite bad thing. I only take the DN for local news. I'd
rather see the international tidbits deleted in favor of more local news and
commentary.
Since I understand Mr. Kendall is a v2020 member, perhaps he would consider
your comments (and mine) in reviewing the policy on letters.
Regards.
Mike Curley
Back to TOC