vision2020
re: Gun Legislation
- To: Marc <cram3813@uidaho.edu>, vision2020@moscow.com
- Subject: re: Gun Legislation
- From: Robert Moore <oshkoshc1@moscow.com>
- Date: Sun, 02 May 1999 23:49:40 -0400
- In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.19990502175246.007aada0@uidaho.edu>
- References: <3.0.5.32.19990430164031.007ab5d0@moscow.com><Pine.GHP.4.05.9904301438460.19482-100000@raven.csrv.uidaho .edu><3.0.5.32.19990430140403.007a6120@uidaho.edu>
- Resent-Date: Sun, 2 May 1999 23:59:17 -0700 (PDT)
- Resent-From: vision2020@moscow.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <"79O8FB.A.Nw.tkUL3"@whale.fsr.net>
- Resent-Sender: vision2020-request@moscow.com
In reply to you question: The sale of these we a big deal about two years
ago. The NRA said they were to be used to hunt bears with. No I can't
rember the name sorry. However the so called Rhino rounds that were
bascily a fragmentation slug were on the market to the public before they
were banned because of their extream nature. I also feel that an assult
wepon is not in our (hunting and shooting sports) best intrest to fight
over. An ak47 is not nor was it ever ment to be used as a hunting weapon.
Robert
>> I however do think an assult type wepon
>>has no place in the hands of the general public!
>
>Why is this?
>
>>and owned in this country. I personaly disagree with what most of the NRA
>>does and fights for (once again assult rifels and teflon coated slugs need
>>not be sold to the public)
>
>Can you name even one teflon-coated slug sold to the public?
>
>Inquiring minds want to know....
>Marc
>
>
Back to TOC