vision2020
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index] [Subject Index]

RE: How much is that doggie sniffing my car...



One other point we might want to consider when evaluating any law 
enforcement method is the likelihood of "false positives" and the 
consequences thereof.  Here, for example, if a dog "targets" my 
vehicle and it does not contain an illegal substance, will I then 
become a "suspect" of the police and subject to increased scrutiny?  
Obviously, I could be completely innocent--never had any drugs in the 
car and the dog is picking up on something else for whatever 
reason--or not so innocent--had drugs in there a few minutes earlier 
but was out delivering them when the dog approached--or in between, 
my wife, brother, child, neighbor (maybe all 4?) had drugs in the car 
previously.  Cars are not like underwear, for example.  Just 
because you find something illegal in them doesn't mean the occupant 
put it there or even knew about it.  While we might drive our 
spouse's, sibling's, child's or neighbor's car, we aren't likely to 
wear his/her/their underwear, unless we live in certain parts of 
California or the underwear has a really cool pattern. . .
I'm wondering if the next step in law enforcement will be a trained 
animals that detect illegal aliens.  I can imagine the training 
course.  
Actually, I confess to realizing that I am being biased in my 
thinking.  I probably would go along with the sniffing activities if 
it could be conducted by cats--you know, your average household 
tabby.  I can see it now.  Three officers straining to hold back 
Buttercup as she pulls them inexorably toward the offending vehicle, 
leaps in the occupant's lap and nestles in purring while rights are 
read and trunks are searched.  Yesma'mandsir, if we can get some 
trained puss to keep us safe from ourselves, I'll vote for it--cause 
I'm betting the independent little cusses will never learn to resist 
an open can of 9 Lives in the trunk--or maybe an unopened can.  There 
won't be much threat of continued surveillance if there's a false 
positive in those circumstances.





Back to TOC