vision2020
Re: Deputy Tim...
Mr. O'Daniel:
Well, as you have seen, there are a number of folks who (a) wondered
about your motivation in identifying yourself as " law student" and
(b) jumped to defend Deputy Tim. I will assume that you appended
"law student" just as others identify their work (sometimes with a
little advertising slogan at the bottom), and not because you thought
the appellation would cloak you with a superior knowledge of law
enforcement officer (LEO) technique and procedure. And, I guess I
read your comment about Deputy Tim NOT as a complaint that you
weren't able to get to the scene of the accident to be in the way and
view the terrible losses that were sustained, but as a complaint
about the way Deputy Tim treated innocent bystanders (when he
presumably didn't know that he should be treating you badly because
you are a law student). I will assume that you had no intention of
being in the way--that in fact, since you were a mile or more back of
the scene, you may not have had any idea why cars were stopped or how
long you were likely to be there--and that maybe an anticipated long
delay would have prompted you to consider turning around and taking
an alternate route into the city if that was possible.
It has not been my experience around Moscow that law enforcement
officers are surly or rude, but that they largely mirror the attitude
of the majority of the community--to the extent they can consistent
with the work they do. I have known some students (and other
younger adults) to complain about their treatment by some officers,
and I think that is unfortunate to the extent it occurs (regardless,
of course, of the age of the "recipient") when it is unnecessary for
the situation. In a job that can require an officer to put her or
his life on the line, it may be a lot to ask that when others have
more closely approached an accident scene (you didn't mention how
close you really were) that the officer you encounter say something
like: "there is a serious accident up there, and I'm going to have
to ask you to stay back beyond ____" , but I hope and believe that
most Moscow/Latah County officers would do so. I don't know Deputy
Tim, and I don't know what he had encountered that day before you.
Maybe a bunch of unruly, disrespectful "rubbernecks" as someone else
called them. Maybe he had been pushed around by a superior, who
knows? Maybe his response to you was untypical for him. We can
recognize that some officers enjoy asserting their authority in
excess of what is needed for the situation and hope that Deputy Tim
isn't one of them. Courtesy may not be a job requirement, but it
sure helps keep the citizens more respectful of an officer's
authority and the pronouncements that are a necessary part of
fulfilling the duties of the position.
Thanks for mentioning the incident. Just because heroic efforts were
being made by law officers, medical personnel, and other emergency
personnel who responded to the tragic scene, doesn't mean everyone
on the periphery behaved as well as we would hope. I think most of
us stuck in a line of cars without knowing why would like some
information when it could reasonably be made available to us. And,
if I'm standing in the wrong spot, a simple "would you please move
over there" would probably suffice.
There just isn't much excuse for the littering, is there? I wouldn't
excuse one of my children for it just because I happened to be around
to pick up their trash--even if I were defending them from a law
student pointing out the error of their ways.
Good luck in your legal career. I hope you are as sensitive to the
needs of your clients as you would like Deputy Tim to have been to
you.
And, a word of advice--I wouldn't be speeding, littering, or
committing any other infractions in front of Deputy Tim if I were
you--in fact, I don't think I would do that if I were me.
Mike Curley
reply to: curley@turbonet.com
208-882-3536
Back to TOC