vision2020@moscow.com: Re: fun fact

Re: fun fact

Bill London (london@wsunix.wsu.edu)
Mon, 14 Apr 1997 11:40:15 -0700 (PDT)

Fritz--
Please reread my original posting. I passed on a message from a
disgruntled person to the list. I never saw it as an attack on the UI.
Had I wanted to attack the UI, I would have done so directly.
Plenty of UI supporters have responded. We've also heard from the
perspective of unhappy employees who would rather see that money spent on
salaries and/or raises for UI staff and faculty. This list served as a
sounding board for both perspectives and I am glad
the issue was discussed in a more open fashion (the value of ceremony
and community-building versus the economic concerns that UI employees
might have).
I do have 2 questions--
1. Did you attend the UI Inauguration and did you see it as
community-building (worth the expense)?
2. Do you think the tone of your posting inspires people to post
contraversial messages on this list?
BL

On Mon, 14 Apr 1997, Fritz Knorr wrote:

> At 07:47 AM 4/11/97 -0700, Bill London wrote:
> >Here's a message I received that was interesting enough to pass
> on....
> > For the inauguration of UI President Hoover, the UI
> cancelled
> >classes, etc. The total cost of the salaries of those who did
> not work
> >that half-day (without including cost of benefits) was $187,649
> >(according to estimate from payroll office).
> > BL
> >
>
> Wow Bill! That is amazing. What a fantastic fun-filled fact!
> And a real quality piece of journalism, too. You professionals
> really find those facts and check them out closely don't you?
> Gosh, how do I become a professional jounalist, too?
>
> Presumably, there is a reason for ceremonies like the
> inauguration. What would it be?
>
> Of course, the big wig administrators might have been sitting
> around brainstorming on how to waste $188,000. They might have
> bounced ideas off each other for hours, finally deciding that an
> inauguration ceremony would be just the thing. But, I don't
> believe it. I believe that the big poo-bahs actually had a
> purpose in mind.
>
> You can think of it Bill. Remember, if it happened at WSU, you'd
> be FLACKIN' it, not ATTACKIN' it.
>
> Community building. That's the answer. Those dumb old U of I
> administrators think that ceremonies like the inauguration
> actually are academic community building activities. Isn't that
> funny? I'm so glad that I have the fun facts on them now.
>
> So here we have Bill London, the self-proclaimed founder and
> leader of Moscow Vision 20/20, which claims to be interested in
> community building, uncorking his blockbusting investigative
> reporting article, attacking the U of I's attempt at...
> community building.
>
> Is this a turf battle? Did those "suits" start horning in on
> your territory? It's ok if they sit in their offices and push
> numbers around spreadsheets. But if they do any kind of
> community building activities; boy, they better watch out for
> Bill London. That's _his_ turf.
>
> I just hope that you don't have the same sharp-penciled and hard-
> nosed accountant that exposed the FUN FACT look with the same
> jaundiced eye at the cost to the U of I of hosting this
> vision2020 listserver. That community building can be expensive
> stuff, you know.
>
> Fritz Knorr
>
>


This archive courtesy of:
First Step Internet