>   There are 4 things that will prevent such tragedies in the future:
> 
    [...]
> 
>   2)  A planning deptartment with some spine to stand up 
                                    ^^^^^^^^^^
   I talked with Dale Pernula today and he informed me that it was
   the Moscow Planning Dept. that contacted the EPA to investigate
   the development on Hwy 95 south.  The planning department is
   pursuing various enforcement options.  By all indications, the
   dept. does have "spine" (though no legal mechanism to protect 
   the land).
   My language about the planning department was unneccessarily
   strident and I do apologize for my rhetoric that tended to 
   muddy, rather than clarify the issue.  My zeal to protect
   people and landscapes tends to overwhelm me at times.  That's not
   an excuse but just recognition of a personal weakness that I need
   to work on.
   My main point is that Moscow needs an environmental impact
   ordinance.  Five years ago, I had a conversation with Linda
   Pall about getting such an ordinance for Moscow.  Now she is in 
   office and we are no closer to protecting our community through 
   such an ordinance.  Why does it take a crisis to wake a
   community up?
   Several years ago, I expressed my deep concern about the
   suitability of the Hwy 95 site for development.  It was a
   disaster waiting to happen.  When the Council voted to
   rezone from Motor Business to Multi-family resdidential,
   I knew there would be trouble unless the City got lucky
   and found an unusual developer who was willing to work
   within the constraints of the landscape, rather than trying
   to make the most money.   
   As the City continues to push outward, most developments
   are going to be in sensitive areas (especially wetlands).
   Without the requirement of an impact ordinance, the good-ole
   boy system will continue and the episode on Hwy 95 will be
   repeated again and again.
   An erosion ordinance is *not* enough.  That is but
   one component of the negative impacts of development.  The 
   ordinance needs to address the cumulative impacts 
   associated with development (traffic, education, noise,
   erosion, wildlife, etc. etc.).
   I would be willing to research and write such an ordinance.
   There are many to choose from.  But then, that is not the problem.  
   The problem is one of power and political will.
-- Greg Brown (gregb@uidaho.edu) Assistant Professor, Dept. of Forestry, Southern Illinois University Adjunct Assistant Professor, College of Forestry,Wildlife,& Range Sciences University of Idaho