> as I understand this b/park thing... the infrastructure comes from the
> tax stuff, but the actual building don't. When I (as FSR and a current
> incubator tenant) was approached re: moving there, the question was
> how would I ever justify building a structure, even if the infrastructure
> already existed. It's MUCH more than a company coming out of the
> encubator can really do. So who is really going to build the buildings?
> these are the guys that are going to get the long term benifit of the
> park as they will be getting subsidized infrastructure, while the
> tenants (which is what we-fsr would be) would be paying market
> prices.....
This is a good question. I have wondered that myself. I hope that
Gibb can answer this.
-- Greg Brown (gregb@uidaho.edu) Computer Services Adjunct Assistant Professor, College of Forestry,Wildlife,& Range Sciences University of Idaho Moscow, ID 83843 (208) 885-2126 Fax: (208) 885-7539